<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16674" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Hi,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Does OmniORB-4 implement transport via shared
memory for local-host client-server transactions? I've seen notes about this as
a potential new feature in the mail archives, but nothing since 2001 or
so.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>I ask not because I think shared memory is
necessarily "better" than TCP loopback, but rather to get a better understanding
of OmniORB's implementation.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Thanks,</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>Tom</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial
size=2>--------------------------------------------------<BR>Thomas C.
O'Reilly<BR>Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute<BR>7700 Sandholdt
Road<BR>Moss Landing, California 95039-9644<BR>831-775-1766
(voice)<BR>831-775-1620 (FAX)<BR><A
href="mailto:oreilly@mbari.org">oreilly@mbari.org</A> (email)<BR><A
href="http://www.mbari.org">http://www.mbari.org</A> (World-wide
Web)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2>"The machine does not isolate man from the great
mysteries<BR> of nature, but plunges him more deeply into
them."</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2> - ANTOINE DE
SAINT-EXUPERY<BR> "Wind, Sand, and Stars"
(1939)</FONT></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial size=2></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML>