[omniNotify] omniNotify cfg file (QoS values)
Janet Tvedt
tvedt at noao.edu
Wed Jun 2 09:44:18 BST 2004
On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 01:50, Frederic Prin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there someone that uses the omniNotify (notifd) Notification Service
> ?
>
> I'm trying to fine tune the cfg file regarding the notifd memory usage
> and I need some help!
>
> Is anybody knows the maximum values for these QoS:
> QueueGCPeriod 30
> And
> ObjectGCPeriod 600
> DeadChanInterval 0
> DeadAdminInterval 0
> DeadConProxyInterval 0
> DeadOtherProxyInterval 600
> DeadFilterInterval 0
>
>
>
>
> Is nobody has the answer, I will really appreciate a global opinion on
> omniNotify.
> (In particular the notifd daemon.)
> Or if you don't use omniNotify, what kind of asynchronous event
> messaging features do you use instead ?
> (omniEvents for example or something of your own)
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Fred
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> omninotify-list mailing list
> omninotify-list at omniorb-support.com
> http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omninotify-list
Fred,
I have been using notifd for several years now and am quite pleased with
the performance. Initially we had problems with memory growth and
occasional lockups. Bob Gruber fixed those problems.
I am not using the latest version however since I don't recall the
Deadxxx QoS parameters. I assume that these specify when notifd should
perform some sort of cleanup operation. I would use the default values
unless you have a good reason to change them.
Several years ago I tried using several event services including
omniEvents. None were adequate for my application. The primary problem
I had was with scalability. omniNotify was the first notification
service I evaluated. It works for us so I have not had a need to
investigate others.
Hope this helps a little.
--
Janet Tvedt
National Solar Observatory
Tucson, Arizona
More information about the omninotify-list
mailing list