[omniORB] Some comments regarding omniThread
Bruce Visscher
bvisscher@mindspring.com
Wed, 08 Jul 1998 23:45:58 -0400
Hello omniORBers,
I've had a few thoughts about the omniThread classes. I'd be interested
in any feedback.
1. I just recently discovered that omni_mutex and omni_mutex_lock have
compiler generated copy constructors and copy assignment operators. I
normally expect to see these declared private and not implemented to
prevent them from being copied.
2. I think it would be useful to have protected access to the omni_mutex
implementation. I have recently had some problems porting NT code that
uses omni_mutex to VMS. The problem is that on NT an omni_mutex is
recursive. On VMS (DECthreads) it is not. The result is that the
application deadlocks on VMS. It would be useful to be able to derive
from omni_mutex for the purpose of initializing the mutex with a
recursive attribute (I realize this would not be portable to other POSIX
implementations...alas, the only portable attribute seems to be the
default one).
3. I think the ReadersWritersLock classes (in src/appl/omniNames)
implement a useful abstraction. Should these be made part of
omniThread?
Thanks,
Bruce