[omniORB] Visibroker with [J]C++Builder

[Duncan Grisby]

On Friday 27 April, mik@geosys.ru wrote:

> First, the interopearble speed was about two times slower than in
> pure VisiBroker/VisiBroker or omniORB/omniORB configurartions (the
> same server and client programs were linked against these and those
> libraries respectively without any other modifications).

Are the client and server running on the same machine?  I believe
VisiBroker uses a shared memory transport in that case. When talking
to omniORB, it would have to resort to TCP loopback, which would
account for the slow-down. According to some performance measurements,
omniORB talking to itself through the TCP loopback is faster than
VisiBroker talking to itself through shared memory.

> Second, while omniORB was able to talk to VisiBroker's Naming
> Service, vice versa access failed - specifically registering new
> names from VisiBroker client with omniNames.

In what way did it fail?

Cheers,

Duncan.

-- 
 -- Duncan Grisby  \  Research Engineer  --
  -- AT&T Laboratories Cambridge          --
   -- http://www.uk.research.att.com/~dpg1 --