RES: [omniORB] omniidl bug in deep and complex namespaces
Juan Esteban Bernabo
jbernab@OpenComm.com.br
Thu, 26 Jul 2001 21:24:31 -0300
Steve,
I see your point, but there is still a bug or some problem in the omniidl
c++ backend that generates code that doesn't compile well.
Until now nobody has replied to this message with a solution.
Anybody has a clue on this problem?
Thank's in advance,
Juan.
-----Mensagem original-----
De: Stephen Crawley [mailto:crawley@dstc.edu.au]
Enviada em: terca-feira, 24 de julho de 2001 10:21
Para: Juan Esteban Bernabo
Cc: Omniorb-List; crawley@dstc.edu.au
Assunto: Re: [omniORB] omniidl bug in deep and complex namespaces
Juan,
I suspect that you are trying to map deeply nested java package names
directly onto IDL with deeply nested modules. This is probably a bad
idea, and probably unnecessary. People typically make this mistake
because they think this the only way to get an IDL -> Java compiler
to replicate the Java package structure in the generated stubs. In
fact, any decent IDL -> Java compiler will allow you to specify the
Java package into which the IDL stubs will slot.
-- Steve