[omniORB] performance

[Sai-Lai Lo]

While I'm sure TAO can offer good performance, I think the notion of real
time aware is more to do with bounded response time rather than fast.
There is no free lunch in this world, more functionality means more
overhead and less performance..

omniORB is quite quick, especially in bulk data transfer (i.e. the
arguments are sequence of bytes/integers etc). It is best to just do a test
yourself or consult one of many the web sites that gives ORB performance
comparisons. 


>>>>> ERIKSSON,TOBIAS (A-Sweden,ex1) writes:

> You might also consider the ACE ORB (TAO), they are quite focused around
> real time issues with their ORB. The homepage is;
> http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/TAO.html

> Regards
>  Tobias


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirk Maiwald [mailto:maiwald@stn-atlas.de]
> Sent: den 13 mars 2001 14:00
> To: 'omniORBList'
> Subject: [omniORB] performance


> Hi,

> I like to use omniORB for interprocess communication.

> I am looking for the fastet method 
> (regarding bytes per sec) for transferring
> bulk data via omniORB. 

> What is the peak performance achievable (using a
> 100 Mbit ethernet)?

> Is there a broadcast available in omniORB?

> I am new to omniORB and would appreciate 
> any comment.


> Dirk Maiwald









-- 
Sai-Lai Lo                                   S.Lo@uk.research.att.com
AT&T Laboratories Cambridge           WWW:   http://www.uk.research.att.com 
24a Trumpington Street                Tel:   +44 1223 343000
Cambridge CB2 1QA                     Fax:   +44 1223 313542
ENGLAND