[omniORB] Why isn't the exception thrown taken care of by the catch(...)
Sai-Lai Lo
S.Lo@uk.research.att.com
29 Mar 2001 10:53:31 +0100
The only reason why omniOrbORB::run() throws an OBJECT_NOT_EXIST is that it
has been destroyed. Do you have a raise condition in your code? That is,
the thread that calls orb->run() only got scheduled to run when another
thread has already called destroy()?
The uncaught exception error is worrying, as Stefan points out, it indicates
that the compiler is not generating the correct exception handling table.
Sai-Lai
>>>>> ERIKSSON,TOBIAS (A-Sweden,ex1) writes:
> Unfortunately I'm not using that flag. The compile line looks like this;
> (basically for all files)
> g++ -Wall -D_REENTRANT -fpic -DPORT=\"Linux2.2c6_x86\" -I. -I..
> -I/ComOpt/Development/CellOpt/AFP/2.3
> -I/ComOpt/Development/CellOpt/AFP/2.3/corba/omniORB3/include
> -DJAVA_LONG_THIRTYTWO -DREQUIRE_RAND_R -DREQUIRE_CTIME_R -DACCEPT_UNSIGNED
> -DUSE_SIGCHLD_HANDLER -DUSE_POSIX_SIGNALS -DNODATABASE
> -DBIN_DIR=\"/usr/local/CellOpt/cellopt-core-1.7/bin/Linux2.2c6_x86\"
> -DAPP_VERSION=\"2.3\" -DAPP_VERSION_SHORT=\"23\" -DSERVER_REV_MAJOR=1
> -DSERVER_REV_MINOR=0 -DSERVER_REV_PATCH=12 -DSERVER_MESSAGE=\""Agilent
> licensing"\" -DMAX_CLIENTS=50 -DSERVER_PORT=8088 -DCORE_REV_MAJOR=1
> -DCORE_REV_MINOR=7 -DCORE_REV_PATCH=22
> -DLOG_PATH=\"/usr/local/CellOpt/log\"
> -DLOG_NAME=\"CellServ.1.7.22.Linux2.2c6_x86\" -DLICENSE_SERVER -D__linux__
> -D__x86__ -D__OSVERSION__=2 -D__OMNIORB3__
> -I/ComOpt/Development/CellOpt/AFP/2.3/flexlm/v7.0/machind -DFLEXLM
> -DFLEXLM_HEARTBEAT_RECONTIME=10 -DFLEXLM_HEARTBEAT_MAXRECON=2
> -DFLEXLM_HEARTBEAT_MAXFAIL=2 -Wno-return-type
> -DDEBUG -g -c -o Linux2.2c6_x86/g/EventQ.o EventQ.cpp
> Regards
> Tobias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefan Seefeld [mailto:seefeld@sympatico.ca]
> Sent: den 28 mars 2001 16:37
> To: omniorb-list@uk.research.att.com
> Subject: Re: [omniORB] Why isn't the exception thrown taken care of by
> the catch(...)
> ERIKSSON,TOBIAS (A-Sweden,ex1) wrote:
>> Hi
>> I've had this problem a couple of times, but I don't seem to be able to
>> figure out what it is.
>> As I run my application it all by a sudden receives an exception (all
>> according to the stack trace below), what is causing it? The stack trace
>> says __throw but why doesn't my catch(...) take it? Instead it terminates.
> I remember having had a similar problem a while ago. I think it was a
> bug in gcc, specifically,
> gcc not being able to deal with exceptions correctly when
> -fomit-frame-pointer (something like that, anyway)
> was given.
> If you have that option, or just use any kind of optimization, you may
> want to recompile without it
> and see whether this makes a difference. The bug I'm talking about was
> reported to the gcc mailing list...
> hope this helps, Stefan
--
Sai-Lai Lo S.Lo@uk.research.att.com
AT&T Laboratories Cambridge WWW: http://www.uk.research.att.com
24a Trumpington Street Tel: +44 1223 343000
Cambridge CB2 1QA Fax: +44 1223 313542
ENGLAND