On Tuesday 17 December, "Lai, Patrick" wrote: > So it seems that -g would be necessary for the 4.2 compiler too. Odd. I'm sure it worked without -g when we had the 4.2 compiler at AT&T. I've checked it in with the -g. Cheers, Duncan. -- -- Duncan Grisby -- -- duncan@grisby.org -- -- http://www.grisby.org --