[omniORB] omniINSPOA and bidir connections (omniORB4)

[Sveta Shasharina]

I have been watching this exchange the whole day and am
ready to conclude that the easiest way to have bidir
and avoid IOR will be to use Naming Service.  Will this be a
fair conclusion?

It seems that orbacus resolved this problem by creating
BootManager which ties object names to the objects.  It has the
advantage over omnimapper that you do not need an
extra process running on the server.  But I 
never made a simple orbacus bidir example work with a Java applet 
client and C++ server using bidir.  It worked,
though when the Java client ran as an application.
________________________________________

Dr. Svetlana Shasharina -- sveta@txcorp.com
Tech-X Corporation  -- www.techxhome.com
Ph:   (720) 563-0322
Cell: (720) 841-4301


-----Original Message-----
From: omniorb-list-admin@omniorb-support.com
[mailto:omniorb-list-admin@omniorb-support.com]On Behalf Of bjorn rohde
jensen
Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 2:55 PM
Cc: omniORB
Subject: Re: [omniORB] omniINSPOA and bidir connections (omniORB4)


Hi guys,

  Woops, i seem to have confused corbaname and
corbalocs a bit:) Ah well...
  I guess, the nicest solution then is to use
a factory pattern, since, at least last i checked,
only servant managers may throw location forward.
OmniMapper relies on a proprietary feature as
described in section 4.8 of the omniORB docu.

Bjorn

_______________________________________________
omniORB-list mailing list
omniORB-list@omniorb-support.com
http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omniorb-list