[omniORB] What about the 100ms upcall delay ?

[Duncan Grisby]

On Tuesday 26 August, orel wrote:

> I've trouble to explain bad performance with OmniORB401 on Linux...  If 
> someone can help me ?

[...]
> Even if I try to test my program on one host with little data size 
> (sequence of 1Kb)
>  with all possible client and server configuration (thread pool with or 
> without watching,
> thread per connection), I always have a 100ms delay for each send/ack step.

First, please update to omniORB 4.0.2, or the current CVS contents.
Some changes were made to speed up oneway handling.

If you still see the problem there, please try to come up with a
minimal example program that shows the problem.

Cheers,

Duncan.

-- 
 -- Duncan Grisby         --
  -- duncan at grisby.org     --
   -- http://www.grisby.org --