[omniORB] omniORB compared to TAO

[James Michael DuPont]

--- Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org> wrote:
> omniORB is a good implementation of the features it has. TAO has many
> more features, is supported on more platforms and compilers, has the
> ACE infrastructure to help with porting to new platforms, and has a 
> more active development community. I think that both products have a
> good long term outlook. I use omniORB for the python mapping and TAO
> for all 
> C++ code, at least partly for historical reasons, partly for 
> portability, and partly for (currently unused) extra features.

OK, what about MICO? Does anyone have experience with MICO and C++?

mike

=====
James Michael DuPont
http://introspector.sourceforge.net/

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more
http://taxes.yahoo.com/