[omniORB] request for dropping site-packages/PortableServer*
from omniorbpy
Thomas Lockhart
lockhart at fourpalms.org
Sun Nov 16 17:28:32 GMT 2003
...
> maybe it's a solution (compromise) to have an option for configure to
> skip installing the standard conformant files in site-packages
> directory?
> That option can than be used by distributions to install omniORBpy and
> other python CORBA impl's so that they all can live side-by-side...
Well if they did that they would be living outside the law, since afaict
they would no longer conform to the standard python mapping defined by
the OMG. Until the standard changes, you should not be allowed to have
both ORBs available in the same namespace.
You *could* install them into separate areas, then use extra code or
environment variables to access them in a standards-compliant way (since
the standard does not forbid manipulating the lookup path from outside
the program).
Is anyone in touch with the pyorbit folks to see if they would be
willing to package their RPMs with an extra module containing that
top-level set of files which cause the conflict? Then one could
optionally install a subset which does not conflict. But until both
packages do it then there would seem to be much room for trouble...
- Tom
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list