[omniORB] Complex numbers

[scott.rediger at teradyne.com]

>This works, but I'm far from convinced, that it is a really good idea...

I agree . This, to me, looks like a maintenance problem down the road for
portability between ORBs, OSs, and compilers.

>Are there other or better ways to link IDL defined types and native C++
types?

Not that there isn't a better way, but we have always written xlate()
functions to map between IDL-structures and implementation-specific
structures.

FWIW,
Scott Rediger