AW: AW: [omniORB] omniidl bug

[Serguei Kolos]

Hi Barthel

I understood your point. You are right there is a problem if one relays 
on the specific features
of the quoted include statement, as it was mentioned by Rene.

However I believe that if one has two IDL files in the same directory 
then one should include
them in the same way (i.e. either with directory prefix or without it) 
otherwise it will be a mess
anyway.

Cheers,
Sergei

>Hi Sergei,
>
>sorry my example provided was wrong.
>
>Here is the fixed example:
>
>
>/firstdir/one.idl     (does #include "seconddir/two.idl")
>/seconddir/two.idl    (does #include "three.idl")
>/seconddir/three.idl
>
>now in two.idl the include three.idl cannot be found. I think it is very common to not provide directoryname if the file resides in the same directoy.
>
>I did the following to compile:
>
>$ cd /firstdir
>$ omniidl -I.. one.idl
>
>omniidl: Warning: No back-ends specified; checking IDL for validity
>In file included from one.idl:1:
>second/two.idl:1: three.idl: No such file or directory
>omniidl: Error running preprocessor
>
>The example works with omniidl from omniORB4.0.3
>
>-marco
>  
>