[omniORB] deleting active servants
baileyk at schneider.com
baileyk at schneider.com
Mon Jan 5 08:37:37 GMT 2004
Just because you want to unload your servant class implementations, does
not mean you need to unload all base classes upon which your servant
classes depend. I've suggested a new mixin class to replace
RefCountServantBase (which is never unloaded unless somehow you unload all
of omniORB). That's all. I haven't seen any argument that shows why that
won't work for you.
Good luck,
Kendall
Pánczél Levente
<Levente.Panczel at co To: <baileyk at schneider.com>, "OmniORB support"
mpuworx.hu> <omniorb-list at omniorb-support.com>
cc:
01/05/2004 07:13 AM Fax to:
Subject: RE: [omniORB] deleting active servants
Hi again
I think we're just about to get to the point:
Kendall, you said
"You cut off the quote. I said it should not be in any shared object
*which will be unloaded*."
And that's the point. I need some of my servant classes to reside in shared
objects WICH CAN BE UNLOADED ON DEMAND.
...
Panczel, Levente
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list