[omniORB] Omni_mutex and static global object
renny.koshy at rubixinfotech.com
renny.koshy at rubixinfotech.com
Wed Sep 15 20:19:14 BST 2004
Alex,
I've hit the problem with Sun's CC compiler, GNU g++ -- though that was in
1998 ... have never even tried to use static initializers since. One
problem for instance, was the order that g++ initialized and CC initialized
things were completely different, and we couldn't figure out what to do.
Renny Koshy
President & CEO
--------------------------------------------
RUBIX Information Technologies, Inc.
www.rubixinfotech.com
Alex Tingle
<alex.omniorb at firetree.net> To: omniorb-list at omniorb-support.com
Sent by: cc:
omniorb-list-bounces at omniorb- Subject: Re: [omniORB] Omni_mutex and static global object
support.com
09/15/2004 06:23 PM
renny.koshy at rubixinfotech.com wrote:
> I agree... static initializers have haunted projects that I've come
> into or been involved with as far back as I can remember.
Modern C++ compilers don't seem to have this problem. I regularly use
GNU/g++, Sun/CC, IBM/xlC, DEC/cxx and HP/aCC and I have never once had
trouble with static initialisers.
Can anyone name a modern C++ compiler that actually exhibits this
problem?
-Alex
--
:: alex tingle
:: 58 kings way, harrow, mddx. uk. HA1 1XU
:: alex.tingle AT firetree.net +44-7901-552763
_______________________________________________
omniORB-list mailing list
omniORB-list at omniorb-support.com
http://www.omniorb-support.com/mailman/listinfo/omniorb-list
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list