[omniORB] Tie mechanism and python

[Duncan Grisby]

On Friday 10 February, andreas at roedl.ch wrote:

> I'm currently trying to understand why there is no tie mechanism for
> the python implementation of omniorb. I mean, is there a reason, why I
> can't create extra template classes for each interface with omniidl
> -Wbtp -bpython <idl> ? Is there something comparable to the tie
> mechanism for omniorbpy? Am I missing something?

The Python language mapping doesn't specify a tie mechanism, so
omniORBpy doesn't provide one. It only exists to make multiple
inheritance situations simpler for C++ (and more significantly for
Java). It's not needed for Python. Why do you want tie classes?

Cheers,

Duncan.

-- 
 -- Duncan Grisby         --
  -- duncan at grisby.org     --
   -- http://www.grisby.org --