AW: Re: [omniORB] Tie mechanism and python
Duncan Grisby
duncan at grisby.org
Thu Feb 16 11:04:00 GMT 2006
On Tuesday 14 February, andreas at roedl.ch wrote:
> I want to tie my python classes - actually pyqt classes - to the
> skeleton classes of the interface. Every class in a pure pyqt
> application is inherited from a qt class, mainly from qobject or
> qwidget classes. I just started to use python for gui (qt)
> applications, but I'm almost certain, that I need tie classes to glue
> omniorb and pyqt together in a sane and elegant way.
You can use multiple inheritance. (Except that with omniORBpy 2.x, you
can't use a new-style class for a servant class, so you might not be
able to. The restriction is lifted in omniORBpy 3.0, currently in beta.)
Having said that, I'd question the design of a program that uses a
single class for both a UI element and a CORBA servant. It suggests poor
separation between diverse parts of functionality. It would be more
normal to use separate classes for the UI parts and the CORBA parts.
Cheers,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby --
-- duncan at grisby.org --
-- http://www.grisby.org --
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list