[omniORB] RE: omniORB-list Digest, Vol 50, Issue 11

[Josh Arnold]

On Thursday 15 June, "Duncan Grisby" wrote:

>You're right that ValueBase should be scoped. However, your C++ compiler
>is broken if it doesn't accept the unscoped form, since the class is
>derived from CORBA::DefaultValueRefCountBase, which is derived from
>CORBA::ValueBase. The compiler should pick up ValueBase from the
>inheritance.
>

Thanks for your quick response!  I'm using MSVC 6, so I'm not surprised that 
there are compiler quirks. ;)

On a related note, I also have a scoping problem with submodules named 
"CORBA".   Such modules get created by the java-to-idl specification.  An 
example is "org::omg::boxedRMI::CORBA::seq1_WStringValue", the java-to-idl 
mapping for a java String array.

The problem is that when the generated classes for seq1_WStringValue 
reference a type such as "CORBA::ULong", the compiler tries to resolve it to 
"::org::omg::boxedRMI::CORBA::ULong" rather than "::CORBA::ULong".   Again, 
this is MSVC 6, so it might not be correct behavior.

For the moment I'm getting around this by postprocessing the generated 
classes to convert instances of "CORBA::" to "::CORBA::" (being careful not 
to touch existing instances of "::CORBA::").

Thanks again,
Josh

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t miss your chance to WIN $10,000 and other great prizes from Microsoft 
Office Live http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/aub0540003042mrt/direct/01/