[omniORB] omniORB and TAO in the same process space

[Friedhelm Wolf]

Alexandre,

fair enough ... you're right ... it's always omniORB which processes the
CORBA calls.
Thanks a lot for your hint.

Friedhelm

On 6/22/07, Alexandre DENIS <Alexandre.Denis at labri.fr> wrote:
>
> On Friday 22 June 2007, Friedhelm Wolf wrote:
>
> > I attatched a core dump which shows, that there are TAO calls made
> > within a omni ORB requests. Please correct me if I misinterpret this
> > dump (I'm no expert at all), but it seems, that the symbols don't get
> > mingled. (maybe because the whole TAO stuff is dynamically loaded at
> > runtime).
>
> This backtrace shows that CORBA::Object::is_nil from omniORB was applied
> to a TAO object.
>
> > But I guess the problem with the _CORBA_bad_param_freebuf() error is
> > due to global symbols too and  so I better find a way to use the ORBs
> > in two separate
> > processes.
>
> Indeed, it would be much better to have different ORBs in different
> processes.
>
> -a.
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.omniorb-support.com/pipermail/omniorb-list/attachments/20070622/af672a68/attachment.htm