[omniORB] Extra omniidl option
Duncan Grisby
duncan at grisby.org
Fri Feb 1 18:34:19 GMT 2008
On Wednesday 30 January, "Will Denissen" wrote:
> Is it currently possible to use (or else how much work will it take to
> add) an omniidl option such that the idl compiler does not have to
> actually include (and therefore depend on) other idl files?
>
> If that can be done the omniidl compiler can run its backends and
> generate all kinds of files from a single idl source and just generate
> include directives in the generated files.
>
> It would greatly simplify the use of omniidl in a larger build framework
> operating on lots of idl files.
I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're asking for. Can you give
a step-by-step explanation of what you want?
Cheers,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby --
-- duncan at grisby.org --
-- http://www.grisby.org --
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list