[omniORB] High virtual memory shown for omniNames
Duncan Grisby
duncan at grisby.org
Fri Jun 26 17:03:33 BST 2015
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 15:19 +0000, Agarwal, Shelendra wrote:
> Total number of entries are less than 100.
>
> Also memory is not increasing, the value of 9g is shown at the start of
> the process itself, i.e. within few minutes of starting of omniNames.
> Non destroying of iterators by client would have resulted in gradual
> memory increase, right?
Yes, unless you have an initial client that spectacularly leaks enormous
numbers of iterators and then goes away for good, you would expect a
leak to cause a gradual increase.
Can you look at the process memory map and see what's so big? You
didn't say what platform you're using, but for example on Linux you can
look at /proc/<pid>/smaps to get details of all the mapped memory
regions.
Cheers,
Duncan.
--
-- Duncan Grisby --
-- duncan at grisby.org --
-- http://www.grisby.org --
More information about the omniORB-list
mailing list