On Monday 11 June, "W. Eliot Kimber" wrote: > Is this IDL really in error (I assume it is)? If so, should omniidl > catch this case? That IDL is extremely ugly, but valid. The bug is in the Python stub generating back-end. It's fixed in CVS. Thanks for the bug report, Duncan. -- -- Duncan Grisby \ Research Engineer -- -- AT&T Laboratories Cambridge -- -- http://www.uk.research.att.com/~dpg1 --